BFRO Tips for Collecting Evidence
by Matt Moneymaker
Tips for Photographing and Measuring Tracks
The most common problem in studying photos of tracks is the in determining the actual dimensions of the tracks. When people who find tracks realize they should place something alongside a track to provide scale, they usually put their own shoe/boot next to it. That may be better than nothing at all, but it complicates independent analysis of the photos because, of course, not all shoes or hiking boots are the same size. A much better thing to do in these situations is to place some common consumer item next to it, like a pop can, or a pack of cigarettes, or coins, or anything you happen to have with you that is mass produced, and is a consistent size and shape, and is widely available.
Individual tracks should be photographed individually, and in sequence, and from various angles. It's very important to photograph the track pathway, showing several tracks in one picture with scale items placed near the tracks. This will make it easier to accurately measure the distance between tracks later. A track pathway should also be photographed from several different angles -- from directly above, looking down onto them; from the side, high enough so the tracks can be clearly seen; from the pathway itself, looking along the path from a standing height.
When making track measurements, each footprint should be measured for length and width. When measuring the stride or step length, (i.e. the distance between steps) the steps should be measured from the same point on one footprint to the SAME POINT ON THE NEXT FOOTPRINT -- toe to toe, or heel to heel. Very often people only measure the open space between foot prints, without noting their method in the measurement data, which leads to a substantial underreporting of step length.
Sections of full-sized footprints frequently include partial or seemingly half-footed imprints on the same trackway. These are important items with respect to foot anatomy and gait. These different types of foot prints should be documented in combination with the step length (heel to heel measurement).
Good height estimates combined with foot prints measured on the ground are extremely valuable. Additionally, grouped footprint tracks, such as those apparently made by an adult and infant, should be studied with great care to determine to what degree the infant is (intermittently) carried. Such occasions are, of course, extremely rare, but having thought through what to do in such a situation is half the battle.
Best Materials for Making Casts of Tracks
"Ultracal 30" is one of the best materials for making casts of tracks. It's manufactured by U.S. Gypsum. You can find it in building supply stores that sell plaster supplies to building contractors. "Ultracal 30" sets in 30 minutes.This casting plaster has almost no expansion or contraction when it sets. The cost is about $20.00 for a 100 lb bag.
Dental Stone is even better than Ultracal, as it is stronger, and shows greater detail than Ultracal. It is also, however, more expensive at around $30.00 for 25 lb bag. But it is often easier to find if the town is large enough to have a medical/dental supply store
If it can be found, Quik Roc is an excellent casting material alternative. It is strong and durable, and relatively cheap at $25.00 for 50 lbs. Its best feature is that it dries in under 10 minutes. It can be found at some building supply stores.
Another good choice is Hydrocal Gypsum Cement.
If at all possible, don't use Plaster of Paris. Plaster crumbles too easily, so plaster should be your last choice.
Tips for Casting Impressions and Tracks
These tips are designed to assist the field investigator in casting impressions in soft material like soil, mud, or even snow. This information is a set of guidelines and accepted practices derived from the law enforcement community. Most of the techniques presented are the "standard" used by not only local area law enforcement, but also by Federal agencies like the FBI and Customs.
Tips for Collecting Physical Evidence
Any hair samples, or any other evidence that may contain DNA, are best collected in a small paper bag. The reason for using paper bags for potential DNA evidence has to do with moisture. Moisture is bad. It will encourage the growth of mold and/or bacteria, both of which have their own DNA and thus will contaminate the DNA analysis. Plastic baggies seal in moisture. Whereas, paper bags absorb moisture and dry out the sample.
On occassion motorists have claimed they hit a bigfoot with their vehicle and the collision left pieces of tissue or blood on the vehicle. Pieces of tissue or blood should be frozen as soon as possible, preferably kept on dry ice. This is essential and helps keep the bacterial count to a minimum. Otherwise, the bacterial decomposition and bacterial DNA will swamp any possibility of extracting native DNA.
Human contact should be avoided since even one or a few scales from the skin can compromise the results. Keep careful track of the chain of custody of your sample--the chain of people who have handled it and when. Often the contamination happens when the hair sample is first pulled from the tree, etc. Any kind of make-shift utensil for putting the hair into a baggie is better than touching it with your fingers. The utensil does not have to be completely sterile. It just needs to be cleaned as well as possible.
There have been several occasions when people found half eaten apples or potatoes with conspicuous tooth marks in them and didn't bother to collect them. Many people don't realize the implications of seemingly trivial tidbits of evidence. The safest blanket recommendation for oddball organic evidence would be to deep freeze it and worry about its disposition later. It can always be shipped frozen on dry ice, if need be. The same would apply to skin and blood if present in any amount, though hair only needs a ziploc baggie.
Camping Equipment Dealers and Expedition Outfitters
Recommended Outdoor Audio & Video Recording Equipment
When shopping for more common devices such as walkie-talkies, etc., be sure to check the prices at Radio Shack. Tempting as it is to chuckle at the suggestion, Radio Shack is among the best sources for field equipment due to their liberal return policy available as part of their "extended warranty." This effectively becomes an insurance policy against any potential field damage. The other nice aspect to such purchases at Radio Shack is that you can walk into any local Radio Shack store (which are located all over the place) with your damaged unit and swap it for a new one right on the spot, over the counter and with no hassles.
| Copyright © 2013 BFRO.net